domingo, 4 de julio de 2021

Lithium-ion Batteries: New Business Opportunities?

 

EV WORLD



1998-2018

 

·         QUICK GUIDE

·         REVIEWS

·         RESOURCES

·         ARCHIVES

·          

Lithium Economics


Lithium-ion Batteries: New Business Opportunities?

Sep 02, 2009

Are lithium-ion batteries really ready to hit the road and if they are, where might new business opportunities lie?

Given the growing recent interest in Lithium-ion batteries for different applications, both within the electric car industry as well as outside of it, many new products and services are beginning to appear at the advent of a promising market. Nevertheless, there is still some confusion as to the real potential for commercialization of this emerging energy storage technology.

In a recent interview given to Business Week, Dr. Menahem Anderman, Founder and President of Total Battery, a consulting firm specialized in opening business opportunities in the advanced battery sector, for example, wrongly argues that since Lithium-ion battery technology is still in its infancy, the danger of using it may be not be negligible: "A significant risk is that one cell failure will take other cells with it and then [the trouble] could spread". As is well known, the safety issue of Li-ion batteries was linked to the use of Cobalt in their chemical composition. With the introduction of at least two other types of Li-ion batteries (based on Manganese and Iron Phosphate) into the market, most carmakers now agree that the problem has been solved.  See, for instance, the recent interview given to CNN by Mr. Wan Chuanfu, Founder and President of Build your Dreams (BYD), a Chinese company that is revolutionizing the electric car market.     

Moreover, the above mentioned consulting firm does not seem to have a specific knowledge about the main trends of the industry in terms of what is actually happening in the automobile industry.  It is not familiar, for example, with recent events such as the recent decision by a number of carmakers (i.e. GM, Nissan, Toyota, etc.) to start using Li-ion (instead of NiMH) batteries in hybrid electric vehicles (both conventional and plug-in) which may pave the way for the inauguration of the Lithium Era in the world (See my recent Seeking Alpha article).

Also, it is not clear about the factors that determine whether Li-ion batteries will be adopted by the global automobile industry in its transition to electric propulsion.  In fact, in a recent Bloomberg story, Mr. Anderman contends:  "I would suggest that the EV market in the U.S. will basically be the California regulatory requirement, plus perhaps 20,000 units.” He then goes on to argue that: "As long as the gasoline price is under $5 a gallon, there’s no real market for EVs." This view, of course, ignores other factors that may have something to do with the formation of the market of both range-extended as well as battery electric vehicles,  such as (i) not only the level of the oil prices but also its volatility; (ii) technological development of such energy storage systems; and (iii) resistance to change, mostly focused in terms of a transition from an energy market dominated by multinational oil companies to a market ruled by state-owned national companies (See my presentation at the Inaugural Lithium Supply & Markets Conference held in January 2009 in Santiago Chile).

Interestingly enough, I couldn't find in the firm's websites any specific business approach to new ventures particularly in the Li-ion battery industry. This shouldn't be surprising given Dr. Anderman's rather skeptical view of the EV market. To the extent that, the Li-ion battery is about half the electric car, both in terms of importance and cost, in a way chances are that if a firm has the battery technology, it will also be able to build an electric car. This is in fact the kind of approach followed by BYD and other Chinese car companies. With slight variations, GM and Mitsubishi may be following a similar approach. Remember also that GM has particularly promised a 10-year guarantee for its Volt car battery.  Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that these batteries may be freely commercialized in the market.  They will be probably sold by those carmakers themselves. Certainly, one could always invest in these companies, but I feel that is not the kind of venture all new entrepreneurs might be looking for. In this context, there appears a need for identifying some other interesting business opportunities in the Li-ion battery and/or electric vehicle markets.

In terms of  other business opportunities that imply leasing (instead of selling) the batteries, which is essentially Better Place's (and Nissan-Renault's) approach, I can only say that this may be highly dependent on technological development of the batteries.  If, for instance, technological development comes around fast, then it would not make any sense to invest in any costly battery replacement infrastructure, such as the one proposed by both Shai Agassi and the Japanese-French Consortium. I have been following closely this issue and I tend to believe that this may be a short-lived business opportunity.  But this is only a preliminary impression, one that needs further scrutiny. 

Lastly, there might be as well other business opportunities outside (but connected to) the Li-ion battery and/or electric car market that may also look promising but they still require further analysis. 

Times Article Viewed: 5118

Note.- This is a republication of a blog originally published on EVWorld.com on September 02, 2009. 

Lithium-ion Batteries for the Hybrids?

 

EV WORLD



1998-2018

 

·         QUICK GUIDE

·         REVIEWS

·         RESOURCES

·         ARCHIVES

·          

Lithium Economics


Lithium-ion Batteries for the Hybrids?

Jul 11, 2009

The recent Hitachi's announcement that beginning next year and by 2015 it will increase its Li-ion battery production by 70 fold for hybrids is quite significant for the Li-ion battery market. Until now, most analysts thought that there was no real potential for use of Li-ion batteries in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs). They erroneously believed that Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) batteries were the best choice for today's HEVs, whereas Li-ion batteries were reserved for tomorrow's Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV), Range Extended Electric Vehicles (REEVs) and Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs).

This argument, of course, never made sense. It rested on the unreasonable two-fold assumption that Li-ion batteries are not ready for prime-time and that plug-ins (and, for that matter, REEVs and BEVs) are a scam. For one thing, Hitachi's notice tears apart the first half of the above contention. For another, Toyota's latest decision to begin mass-producing PHEVs by 2012 and Nissan's conviction that "now's time to go electric" completely demolish the second half of it. Indeed one should not be surprised since PHEVs can be really thought of as an extension of HEVs. So if Li-ion batteries are to be used quite soon in plug-ins and both range-extended and battery EVs, then why not utilize them now for conventional hybrids as well? The new General Motors appears to have understood this. It just asked Hitachi to produce Li-ion batteries for its 100,000 hybrids that it plans to sell from next year.

Taken together, this only means that both NiMH and Lead Acid (LA) battery makers have many reasons to worry nowadays. And some of them, perhaps aided by their government, appear to have started to take some actions. In China, for example, they may be behind their government's decision to impose restrictions to lithium-ion battery vehicles. At first sight, these constraints may seem somewhat astonishing, considering that China holds one of the most advanced lithium-ion battery car makers of the world, namely Build your Dreams (BYD). However, they may be indeed part of a rather rational approach to help a number of other car producers that for the last five years or so have been heavily investing in NiMH and LA battery technologies for their different cheap plug-ins and electric vehicles, already running on Chinese roads and/or getting ready for export to other countries.

While I doubt anything like it could happen in Japan or in the U.S., one should be aware that all these recent events will begin to change dramatically the battery car market as a whole. In this connection, Hitachi's approach is likely to be followed by other battery makers in Japan and elsewhere. But this may be a short-lived approach. We will not have to wait too long until the major car makers of the world realize that mass-producing REEVs and BEVs (rather than HEVs and PHEVs) is the correct way forward. The new GM and Nissan seem to be quite clear about it, while Toyota also appears to be moving (albeit cautiously) in the right direction.

I have previously explained why I thought it was in Toyota's (and Honda's) interest to behave this way. But, given both recent GM's re-launch and Nissan's renewed financial situation after having been granted a $ 1,6 billion loan to develop advanced Li-ion batteries for its new pure electric car, to retain its largest share in the automobile market of the world, Toyota will probably need to modify significantly its current conservative business strategy.

Times Article Viewed: 4484

Note.- This is a republication of a blog originally published on EVWorld.com on July 11, 2009.

Bolivia: The New Saudi Arabia of the World? A Review of Recent Facts

 

EV WORLD



1998-2018

 

·         QUICK GUIDE

·         REVIEWS

·         RESOURCES

·         ARCHIVES

·          

Lithium Economics


Bolivia: The New Saudi Arabia of the World? A Review of Recent Facts

Jun 30, 2009

 

In a previous blogI argued that three conditions needed to be met for Bolivia to become the “New Saudi Arabia of the World”. First, the electric car rush should start along with the launch of GM´s Volt. Second, Bolivia had to begin producing lithium carbonate in a proportion appropriate to the world´s needs. Third, increases in lithium prices should not make the production of other lithium resources (e.g. spodumene) commercially viable.

 

A recent review of facts gives rise to the following conclusions. First, the electric car rush along with the launch of the Volt is on schedule. Second, given Bolivia´s latest decision to go on its own to develop its lithium resources, it appears that the country has chosen the most difficult route to supply lithium carbonate to the world. And, third, this erratic behavior is in fact encouraging the production of other spodumene lithium resources in other parts of the world.

Under these circumstances, Bolivia seems to start losing sight of its golden opportunity to become the “New Saudi Arabia of the World” while postponing the inauguration of the affordable electric vehicle era in the planet.

Times Article Viewed: 3526

Note.- This is a republication of a blog originally published on EVWorld.com on June 30, 2009. 


Bolivia: The New Saudi Arabia of the World?

 

EV WORLD



1998-2018

 

·         QUICK GUIDE

·         REVIEWS

·         RESOURCES

·         ARCHIVES

·          

Lithium Economics


Bolivia: The New Saudi Arabia of the World?

Mar 16, 2009

In recent months there has been a real avalanche of news and comments from the international press about the lithium reserves of the Salar of Uyuni. In this context, Bolivia has been compared with Saudi Arabia in reference to the possibility that the country will become in the next few years a major energy source on earth. However, it is too early to tell whether Bolivia will become the new Saudi Arabia of the world. This depends on at least three factors.

First, the electric car rush must start to begin with. In order for this to happen the launch of GM´s Volt is crucial. It is important to remember that it was precisely GM the first global car maker to announce in January 2007 that by 2010 it would introduce the first mass-produced lithium-powered plug-in hybrid electric cars into the market. This should not diminish the importance of the recent BYD and Chery cars launching in China, pointing only to the magnitude of the US market for one of the world´s most revolutionary technological innovations of the last 100 years.

Second, Bolivia has to start producing lithium carbonate in a proportion appropriate to the world´s needs. This, of course, is not an easy task considering both the country´s lack of experience in producing the metal and the government´s decision not to allow any foreign assistance or investment in this endeavor.

Third, increases in lithium prices (emerging perhaps from an early temporary supply crunch) should not make the production of other lithium resources (e.g. spodumene) commercially viable.  

*  Economist, Lithium Economics Analyst based in Bolivia, jczuleta@gmail.com

Times Article Viewed: 3266

Note.- This a republication of a blog originally published on EVWorld.com on March 16, 2009.  

The Advent of the Lithium Era in Bolivia

 

EV WORLD



1998-2018

 

·         QUICK GUIDE

·         REVIEWS

·         RESOURCES

·         ARCHIVES

·          

Lithium Economics


The Advent of the Lithium Era in Bolivia

Apr 05, 2008

Juan Carlos Zuleta Calderón *

Last Tuesday, Evo Morales, President of Bolivia, announced the construction of a small pilot plant to produce lithium carbonate at the delta of Rio Grande in Uyuni, where it is believed are laying the richest brines of lithium of the world, thereby inaugurating the lithium era in Bolivia. As is well known, with its 5,4 million tons of lithium (metal equivalent), Bolivia holds around 50% of world reserves of the lightest and most electro-negative metal of the planet.

The small pilot plant will cost 5.7 million US dollars. As President Morales indicated, this is only the first phase of a larger project aimed also at industrializing all the non-metal resources (e.g. boron, potassium, magnesium, and sodium) of the Uyuni Salt Lake in the Department of Potosi, which has been estimated to cost 150 million US dollars, an amount that at present the Bolivian State is willing to invest since its return is granted and this will ensure that Potosi becomes once again the center of the country´s economy.

This announcement leaves aside, at least for the time being, any other supposition that the political situation of the country could jeopardize the provision of lithium to the world in times of an escalating demand for the resource resulting to a great extent from an apparently irreversible transition of the global automobile industry to electric propulsion.

* Economist, jczuleta @gmail.com

Times Article Viewed: 3938

Note.- This is a republication of a blog originally published on EVWorld.com on April 05, 2008.

The Obama Audit Task Force and the Volt

 

EV WORLD



1998-2018

 

·         QUICK GUIDE

·         REVIEWS

·         RESOURCES

·         ARCHIVES

·          

Lithium Economics


The Obama Audit Task Force and the Volt

Apr 18, 2009

In several articles published over the last year and a half or so both in Bolivia and the United States I have advocated GM‘s Volt as a technological innovation that would revolutionize the global car industry. So, on March 30 2009 I was astonished by the main conclusion of the Obama Audit Task Force (OATF) regarding the Volt:

“GM is at least one generation behind Toyota on advanced, “green” powertrain development. In an attempt to leapfrog Toyota, GM has devoted significant resources to the Chevy Volt.”

This conclusion only reflects the OATF´s failure to understand what advanced “green” car technology really means.

In a recent blog I have argued that by relying on (obsolete but still commercially viable) nickel-metal hydride batteries for their conventional hybrids, both Toyota and Honda have been following a similar but rather cautious and conservative approach to a lithium-based transition to electric propulsion in the global car industry.

This entirely rational behavior not only comes down to a different business strategy than that of their main competitor: General Motors (GM); it also implies their lagging behind GM insofar as electric automobile technology.

In fact, while conventional hybrids have played a big role in raising driver´s consciousness over the last ten years or so, everybody now agrees that Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), Range Extended Electric Vehicles (REEVs) and Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) are the obvious steps forward. Something all these new EV technologies share in common is their dependence on lithium.

Both Toyota and Honda know that for sure; that is precisely why they are now investing a great deal in lithium. But given the critical situation of the American motor giant, it simply does not (and did not) make any sense for them to become GM´s technology followers or even leapfroggers.

Had they decided to become followers or leapfroggers of GM, they would have had to lose part of what they seem to value the most nowadays: their reputation. One just needs to remember that at the time GM made its Volt announcement, it was already facing severe financial problems and Toyota and Honda were still the second and third largest automakers of the world (As of today, Toyota is first and Honda remains third).

It was then probably wise for Toyota to stick – at least for the time being - with its much proven and praised Prius technology and let other car makers undergo the painful “trial and error” process of the new way of doing things. One must keep in mind also, that to leapfrog GM, Toyota first would have had to kill the Prius.

In a similar vein, it also made sense for Honda to be inclined towards a two-step approach to electrification: first, emulate the know-how (i.e. the Prius technology) advanced by a much more respected firm (Toyota) than GM and, second, come up with something revolutionary, something beyond lithium; the hydrogen-powered FCX Clarity model, for instance.

Of course one should not be surprised if, also as part of their business strategy, sometime down the line both Toyota and Honda introduce some sort of lithium-powered electric cars into the market. As I have recently commented on Seeking Alpha, however, this may occur only at the expense of a technological lag.

Hence the OATF in its recent March 2009 report did not appear to have a clue in terms of what advanced “green” car technology really means. Perhaps some consumers in the US and the UK government could have provided the Task Force with some valuable hints in this regard.

Times Article Viewed: 4608

Note.- This is a republication of a blog originally published on EV World on April 18, 2009.